Malte Helmert <helm...@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> added the comment:
> I see. I wish that people would a) always provide complete patches in > a single file, and b) delete files themselves that have been > superceded by others. In any case, I have re-attached the file; > thanks for pointing this out. Regarding b), I did that as far as I could (i.e., deleted my own files that were superseded). I left the unit test as a separate file because I wasn't too sure if it would get incorporated -- it looks a bit flaky because it relies on timing issues, and it's also one of the longer-running tests as it spends (comparatively) a lot of time in a busy loop. I wouldn't be surprised if it breaks on some machines sometimes, especially ones with low clock granularity. Thanks for the comment though, I'll keep it in mind in the future. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1040026> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
