Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Not sure the "del e" idea was a good solution to the garbage collection problem. Amaury's code looks correct to me. Maybe the existing e variable should be overwritten and the left intact (as it used to be) or perhaps it should be made both temporary and invisible like the induction variable in a list comprehension. Phillip, any thoughts? ---------- assignee: -> pje nosy: +pje, rhettinger _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4617> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
