STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:

> I think when I wrote this I was over-optimistically thinking that we could 
> just add more patterns, but if it's becoming a pain, then your approach looks 
> good to me.

Well, I tried hard to fit into this approach: over the years, I added more and 
more patterns... but it's a painful work: first a CI break, I add more patterns 
and then I have to backport the change to all branches. As I wrote, I'm not 
convinced of the purpose of getting a failure in this case. Python doesn't get 
any benefit from this.

Anyway, I merged my change. Thanks for your approval ;-)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37362>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to