Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> added the comment:
> If we should put in the workaround for 3.8, how does that make it okay to > remove in 3.9? I can easily change my PR to keep it in 3.9, no problem. Nick, what do you think? > put the new field at the end and leave the deprecated one exactly as it was. Can you give a least an argument of why that's better than putting back tp_print at the end? I gave 3 why that's NOT a good idea: msg345357 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37250> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
