STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
> I just realized that there is a much simpler solution: add back tp_print at > the *end* of the PyTypeObject structure. This will fix the Cython problem and > is even less likely to break stuff. I'm doing that in PR 14193. If we reintroduce it, why not put it back at its previous place, to provide ABI compatibility? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37250> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
