Pablo Galindo Salgado <pablog...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thank you Carol for your comment! Regarding your proposal, I find it it attractive as a compromise in order to make more gentle the introduction of the feature to users. I really appreciate the effort to balance all the different aspects and concerns. Ccould you extend your thoughts regarding this concern that I have with respect of not including the trailing / in 3.8 but doing it in 3.9: >I think documenting the trailing "/" is especially important because now users >will find very confusing the fact that functions only document the "/" in some places. They may start to believe that a trailing "/" is illegal syntax or that the "/" at the end is optional. This will lead to even more confusion IMHO. Another minor concern that I have is the fear that we will have a similar discussion in the future when the PR adding the trailing / to 3.9 would be added. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue37134> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
