Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> added the comment:
FWIW, I don't see the problem with supporting any read-only "buffer" object, rather than just bytes objects, for the string of bytes in a code object. That's all that Dino is proposing. The change is not invasive and solves a real need. The additional maintenance burden is negligible. Furthermore, the accommodation makes sense conceptually. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36839> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
