STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:

So far, there is no clear agreement to expose C PyConfig structure in Python, 
so I close the issue.

My PEP 587 has been accepted. I chose to not expose PyConfig in Python in the 
PEP. But I'm open to revisit this idea later, especially to move towards PEP 
432: implement multi-phase initialization (only partially supported in my PEP 
587).

But I would prefer to a different rationale than exposing hash_seed. For 
hash_seed alone, I don't think that it's worth it. Moreover, Christian wrote:

> hash_seed and use_hash_seed could be added to sys.hash_info. This would be 
> the first place I'd look for the information. After all I implemented it. :)

----------
resolution:  -> rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33919>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to