STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
So far, there is no clear agreement to expose C PyConfig structure in Python, so I close the issue. My PEP 587 has been accepted. I chose to not expose PyConfig in Python in the PEP. But I'm open to revisit this idea later, especially to move towards PEP 432: implement multi-phase initialization (only partially supported in my PEP 587). But I would prefer to a different rationale than exposing hash_seed. For hash_seed alone, I don't think that it's worth it. Moreover, Christian wrote: > hash_seed and use_hash_seed could be added to sys.hash_info. This would be > the first place I'd look for the information. After all I implemented it. :) ---------- resolution: -> rejected stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33919> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com