New submission from Terry J. Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
C.l.p poster reported that 3.0 file.read is orders of magnitude slower
than with 2.5 (but confused issue with buffer = 0). Jerry Hill reported
"Here's a quick comparison between 2.5 and
3.0 on a relatively small 17 meg file:
C:\>c:\Python30\python -m timeit -n 1
"open('C:\\work\\temp\\bppd_vsub.csv', 'rb').read()"
1 loops, best of 3: 36.8 sec per loop
C:\>c:\Python25\python -m timeit -n 1
"open('C:\\work\\temp\\bppd_vsub.csv', 'rb').read()"
1 loops, best of 3: 33 msec per loop
That's 3 orders of magnitude slower on python3.0!"
I verified this informally on WinXP by opening and then reading
Doc/Pythonxy.chm (about 4 megs) -- an eye blink versus 3 seconds,
repeated. Even the open seemed slower but I did not time it.
>>> f=open('Doc/Python30.chm','rb')
>>> d=f.read()
----------
components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib)
messages: 76915
nosy: tjreedy
severity: normal
status: open
title: 3.0 file.read dreadfully slow
type: performance
versions: Python 3.0
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4533>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
