Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> I'm using it both for comparisons which needed to build an abstract base > class and typing. Currently there are 2 ways, i need to create a dummy abc > and put type() calls everywhere or i need to set a constant to my module and > _abc_data is totally irrelevant with this. I dont think users want that. It doesn't make sense to me. Could you elaborate? > Abstract base classes can be called a core part of python too abc is core part. But note that _py_abc can be used instead of _abc. _abc_data is used only when _abc is used as backend of abc. At least, your pull request doesn't work correctly when _py_abc is used. > and when someone needs to obtain type of the struct that holds state of ABCs > it shouldnt be hard, types module should expose it. I think it is bad idea and we don't support such usage officially at all. Such code doesn't work when _py_abc is used. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36764> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
