Michael Foord <mich...@voidspace.org.uk> added the comment:
> On 30 Mar 2019, at 23:48, Michael Foord <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > > Michael Foord <mich...@voidspace.org.uk> added the comment: > > An auto-magic cache clearing mechanism is really tempting. I tend to agree > with Raymond though, if code needs and progress a cache clearing mechanism it > should be treated and accessible. * exposes (not progress) * tested (not treated) Sorry. > > They're are probably some problematic caches still within unittest however. > Do test results still keep alive all tracebacks until test reporting? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue36485> > _______________________________________ ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36485> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com