Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Looks fine to me, somebody please backport it.
I'm concerned about the memory leak that this may cause, though (IIUC): all the values are garbage, provided that they are pointers to dynamic memory in the first place. I think in the long run, we should allow to store a pointer to a release function along with actual value to release. ---------- assignee: loewis -> priority: critical -> release blocker resolution: -> accepted _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1683> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
