Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Oh doh. That's what I get for trying to produce a minimal test case without thinking :-( Thanks for the pointer. I originally hit this (or what I thought was this) in pipx - see https://github.com/pipxproject/pipx/issues/122 but then tried a smaller test, misread the error as being the same (there's so much noise when the subprocesses fail!) and reported it here without sufficient checking. Thanks, and my apologies for the noise! ---------- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue36435> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
