Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This "_fo_read_no_intr" method does not exist anywhere in the standard python code.
A quick Google search reveals that it certainly comes from a patch proposed by the Ubuntu maintainers: http://patches.ubuntu.com/p/python2.5/extracted/subprocess-eintr- safety.dpatch It is very likely that this patch (for 2.5) did not apply correctly to the 3.0 source code. In any case, this is not a Python problem. ---------- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc resolution: -> invalid status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4390> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
