STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
> 3. I realize that PEPs are needed for any change and even to define what > that change might look like, but is there any value in adding > PendingDeprecationWarnings for 3.8 if that's a possible action that will > happen? As I understand it, it would be easier to remove that warning later > instead of delaying any actions from it. We cannot modify Python before a PEP is approved. It's too early to see that a PEP removing support for .pth file will be approved or not. There are too many constraints and use cases. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33944> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
