Ivan Pozdeev <ivan_pozd...@mail.ru> added the comment:
> This brings to mind the transition of many programs from using a single > config file or startup script to using a directory of config/startup files > parsed/executed in alphabetical order. Would a sitecustomize.d/ directory > (with files within it executed in alphabetical order) as a replacement for > executable code in .pth files be an improvement on the status quo? No, because the required execution order is governed by package interdependencies rather than names. SysVInit went around this by hand-picking number prefixes to files in rcN.d/ but this proved unmaintainable in the long run. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33944> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
