Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Martin:
Looking at it I agree with you 100% - the patch is too complicated for what it is intending to resolve. It simply does not need another accessor function to muddy the waters when making the symbol public as done in #4288 resolves the issue. My personal preference is to try to hide such data structures - but that doesn't always mean its the correct thing to do :-) _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4279> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
