Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> set.union() without constructing the set you call union on only happens to > work for the set.union(a) case because `a` is already a set. Good point. I wasn't thinking clearly about the unbound-methodness of this. > I'm -1 on making any changes to set.union to support this misuse case. Agreed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35338> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
