STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment: Unexpected cool effect of static inline functions (copy of my email): https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2018-November/155747.html
Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 01:06, Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org> a écrit : > I expect the largest visible impact may be that a profiler may now attribute > CPU cycles takes by these code snippets to the function from the .h file > rather than directly to the functions the macro expanded in in the past due > to additional debug symbol info attribution. Just more data. Consider that a > win. Oh. That's very interesting. I just tried gdb and I confirm that gdb understands well inlined function. When I debug Python, gdb moves into Py_INCREF() or Py_DECREF() when I use "next". I also tried perf record/perf report: if I annotate a function (assembler code of the function), perf shows me the C code of inlined Py_INCREF and Py_DECREF! That's nice! Victor ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35059> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
