New submission from Julien Palard <julien+pyt...@palard.fr>:
This morning I was teaching Python (again and again), and again I was thinking we could do better about the representation of ranges. Typically in the current repr of ranges we do not see that the end is excluded: >>> range(10) range(0, 10) However it has the (little?) benefit of respecting the "repr gives valid Python". I propose to change it to: >>> range(10) <range object [0, 1, ..., 8, 9]> ---------- messages: 329531 nosy: mdk priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Range repr could be better type: enhancement versions: Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue35200> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
