New submission from Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> int('\0', 256)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 256: '\x00'
>>> int('x', 256)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
ValueError: int() base must be >= 2 and <= 36
>>>
The former is misleading. \x00 is a perfectly valid byte if the base is
256. The real problem, that base 256 isn't supported, is obscured. It
would be much better for the latter case's message to be used in the
former case.
----------
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 75290
nosy: exarkun
severity: normal
status: open
title: inconsistent exception from int is confusing
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.6
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4221>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
