Karthikeyan Singaravelan <tir.kar...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> From what I understand, this can be done in one of two ways. First, we could > edit > https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/ad73a9cf97770023665a1bb1c6390a3c99478139/Modules/main.c#L430 > and not incrementing -s and -E. But I believe this would have consequences > that I'm unable to think of right now, so I'd like some inputs on this. As in the docs for -I it implies -s and -E so removing the increment is not a good solution in my opinion and will break code. I don't know how this can be handled since -I sets -s and -E implicitly and _args_from_interpreted_flags just looks for the set flag. This could also get a little complex if we remove -s and -E based on -I since one might pass -I and -s. Maybe we can do an intersection of the command line arguments passes and the set bits in _args_from_interpreted_flags so that only -I remains? Victor prefers -I only and maybe has an approach to solve this? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34812> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
