Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> See this for Yury's self-described "hack-ish fix we can use" until we do
> something better:
Actually, I think I found a better solution that doesn't require any changes to
anything besides dataclasses.
Currently, dataclasses uses 'exec()' function to dynamically create methods
like '__init__'. The generated code for '__init__' needs to access MISSING and
_HAS_DEFAULT_FACTORY constants from the dataclasses module. To do that, we
compile the code with 'exec()' with globals set to a dict with {MISSING,
_HAS_DEFAULT_FACTORY} keys in it. This does the trick, but
'__init__.__globals__' ends up pointing to that custom dict, instead of
pointing to the module's dict.
The other way around is to use a closure around __init__ to inject MISSING and
_HAS_DEFAULT_FACTORY values *and* to compile the code in a proper __dict__ of
the module the dataclass was defined in. Please take a look at the PR.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34776>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
