Ronald Oussoren <ronaldousso...@mac.com> added the comment:
IMHO there doesn't need to be a new API unless the semantics change w.r.t Py_TYPE (for example by adding an API that returns an owned reference instead of a borrowed reference). Py_TYPE can work with an opaque version of PyObject by turning it into a function. BTW. Changing PyObject into an opaque structure is non-trivial because every instance currently explicitly contains a PyObject structure as the first field of the object definition. ---------- nosy: +ronaldoussoren _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34704> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
