Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I think the Py_ssize_t change is clearly documented in the "What's new" document: http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/2.5.html#pep-353-using-ssize-t-as-the-index-type This paragraph also links to: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0353/#doesn-t-this-break-much-code which happens to mention the incompatibility in the slice API.
Didn't you get any compilation warning? I suggest to use a newer version of Scientific Python: 2.7 at least uses Py_ssize_t throughout its code. ---------- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4129> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
