Paul Ganssle <p.gans...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I'm finding it very difficult to reconcile these things. I'm not entirely sure, but we may need to take a performance hit in normal strftime if we want to make this work with surrogate characters, which really does not appeal to me (though we can certainly improve to some degree). One major question here: Is anyone (@vstinner, @belopolsky?) know why time's strftime opportunistically uses wcsftime instead of strftime? It makes the code *way* more complicated and difficult to read / maintain - are there platforms that provide wcstrftime and not strftime? Also, related, it seems according to https://bugs.python.org/issue10653#msg243660 that there may have been a regression in issue #10653, which may be related here. Either way, some note should probably be made in the code to clarify exactly *why* these choices were made in the code, in case the situation has changed. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34481> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
