Jeffrey C. Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
The duplicate zero-or-one repeat operator bug described in this issue
originally no longer exists in python 2.6.
However, Trent Mick brings up a fair point in that expressions of the
form (x*)? generate an error (issue 1456280) when internally the '?'
should be passively stripped from the expression by the Python Regular
Expression Compiler because it is redundant. The same goes for
expressions of the form (x*)* (issue 2537). Also, there is a problem
with expressions of the form (x*){n,m} (issue 1633953), since the x*
matches as much as it can, and thus it sees the range repeat operation
as redundant -- in this case I think the range repeat should have the
effect of matching (x*)(x*)(x*)... n to m times, but since the first
time matches everything, the subsequent matches all match zero-width
expressions following the first one. I am tracking all of these issues
under Item 33 of Issue 2636.
The are the 3 known redundant repeat issues, but this one, the zero-or-
one followed by zero-or-one is AFAICT fixed in python 2.6 as the
expression originally listed now passes compile.
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue214033>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
