Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > It is not documented anywhere but in the code
These also appear in file names of bdist commands, right? So I think it should be documented. > We (Bob Ippolitto and I) had some discussion about the architecture > strings when > we were working on support for universal binaries and rejected my > initial suggestion > of using "i386,ppc" instead of "fat" because that would be unwieldy. OK. I wonder how you will call fat 64-bit binaries (i.e. ppc64 and amd64), but I can live with that semantics as long as it's documented (I actually question that it is documented in the code. If somebody would put "-arch Itanium" in her CFLAGS, which might be supported in 10.9, it would infer that the architecture is "fat"). _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4064> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
