STINNER Victor <vstin...@redhat.com> added the comment:
(Ah, Benjamin restarted the discussion, so I reopen this issue.)
> I understand the desire to compile Python with OpenMP.
I'm not sure that I understood the use case. Do you want to only compile Python
core ("python3" binary") or just stdlib C extensions, or both?
> But the resolution here is hiding _Py_atomic symbols all the time, even when
> OpenMP isn't involved, and even when building a standard extension module.
Sorry, but I don't understand the problem. Why is it an issue to hide
_Py_atomic symbols?
----------
resolution: fixed ->
status: closed -> open
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue25150>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
