Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:
I think (space) 'performance' would be a better label, as this is strictly an implementation improvement, not a language change. But we often (usually? sometimes?) limit performance improvements to the 'next version' so we have the alpha/beta/candidate releases to discover possible regressions. I think this is worth considering just because the pattern is so odd. But if this is ironed out as part of a broader and better patch, great. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy stage: -> needs patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue34100> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
