Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Thinking about this some more, I'm inclined to go the same way we did with
issue 33932: classify it as an outright regression, work out the desired
requirements for a missing embedding test case, and then fix the implementation
to pass the new test case.
My suggestion for test commands would be:
../Lib/site.py
-m site
-c 'import sys; print(sys.argv)' some test data here
Once those work properly, we'd consider the regression relative to Python 3.6
fixed.
Those could either be 3 different test cases, or else we could run them all
within a single test case, with a Py_Initialize() call before each one (since
Py_Main() calls Py_Finalize() internally).
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34008>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
