New submission from John Reese <jre...@leetcode.net>:
When type checking applications using lib2to3, the difference in types for lib2to3.pytree.Base.children versus Node.children makes it difficult to accept both leaves and nodes and programatically work with child nodes/leaves. Base/Leaf both have `children` defined as an empty Tuple, while Node defines it as an empty list. It would be more useful for Base/Leaf to also use an empty list, so that the type is the same, regardless of which type of object you are given. ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 320616 nosy: jreese, lukasz.langa priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: unify types for lib2to3.pytree.Base.children type: enhancement versions: Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33983> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
