Andrés Delfino <adelf...@gmail.com> added the comment: Yeah, I think you are right. The motivation for this PR was to not have two PEPs references in the same line, because, IMHO, it looks somewhat weird. Now, they look like:
"See also: PEP 3115 - Metaclasses in Python 3 PEP 3129 - Class Decorators" Would a change to make it look like: """ See also: PEP 3115 - Metaclasses in Python 3 PEP 3129 - Class Decorators """ be accepted? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue33726> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
