Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The 3.0 forward port of r66386 still needs a once over before being committed (there were enough differences that I don't think the review of the 2.6 version is enough to cover the 3.0 version as well).
Once that is done, then this issue can be closed. _______________________________________ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3781> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
