Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: I'm not fond of this proposal. The existing behaviour is harmless; especially for a thread pool, since threads are cheap resources. Improving the logic a bit might seem nice, but it also complicates the executor implementation a bit more.
Besides, once the N threads are spawned, they remain alive until the executor is shut down. So all it takes is a spike in incoming requests and you don't save resources anymore. ---------- nosy: +tomMoral versions: +Python 3.8 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24882> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
