Tim Peters <t...@python.org> added the comment: Stefan, yup! Thank you. `array.array` and `bytearray` iterators appear to work the same way as `list` iterators here.
Terry, the note in the `for` statement docs was written before there _was_ an iterator protocol. For example, here are the 1.5.1 docs: https://docs.python.org/release/1.5.1/ref/ref-9.html#HEADING9-27 Back then, the expression_list had to evaluate to a "string, tuple or list". Or so the docs said - I don't remember the implementation details. Regardless, I think we all agree the note is at best out of date ;-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32767> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
