Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment: > With the 3.7 beta deadline just around the corner, 3.8 will be the next > opportunity to reconsider this idea.
Nick, Ned, Guido, Would it be OK if we add this to 3.7beta2? I feel kind of bad about this one... few thoughts: 1. The speedup is about 5-10% on macro-benchmarks! This is significant. 2. Inada-san offered me help with this, and I declined, saying that I plan to do more research/experiments and commit it before 3.7. And I didn't have time to do it because of other work I did for CPython. 3. Even though the optimization is invasive, I feel confident about it. It just so happens that whatever modification we do to ceval, it will be covered 100% with tests or any code you execute. Any regression or anomaly should become apparent almost immediately. 4. We'll have quite a bit of time to see if this works or not. This isn't a new functionality, so we can always pull it from the first RC build if necessary. ---------- nosy: +inada.naoki, ned.deily _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue26219> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
