Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> added the comment: Yury also asked me to try running a generator/coroutine microbenchmark from PEP 492 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/#async-await). I'm attaching the actual script for that as well (pep492bench.py), since I had to add a few lines to actually run the functions in the PEP :-).
Results from 3 runs each of the two builds, alternating: ----- ~/src/cpython$ without-unawaited-tracking/install/bin/python3 pep492bench.py binary(19) * 30: total 7.349s abinary(19) * 30: total 7.727s ~/src/cpython$ with-unawaited-tracking/install/bin/python3 pep492bench.py binary(19) * 30: total 7.758s abinary(19) * 30: total 8.023s ~/src/cpython$ without-unawaited-tracking/install/bin/python3 pep492bench.py binary(19) * 30: total 7.326s abinary(19) * 30: total 7.686s ~/src/cpython$ with-unawaited-tracking/install/bin/python3 pep492bench.py binary(19) * 30: total 7.652s abinary(19) * 30: total 7.999s ~/src/cpython$ without-unawaited-tracking/install/bin/python3 pep492bench.py binary(19) * 30: total 7.421s abinary(19) * 30: total 7.732s ~/src/cpython$ with-unawaited-tracking/install/bin/python3 pep492bench.py binary(19) * 30: total 7.541s abinary(19) * 30: total 8.132s ----- So here we get a small difference between the with-unawaited-tracking and the without-unawaited-tracking builds. For generators, with-unawaited-tracking is: In [1]: (7.541 + 7.652 + 7.758) / (7.349 + 7.326 + 7.421) Out[1]: 1.0386947863866764 ~3.9% slower. And for coroutines, with-unawaited-tracking is: In [2]: (8.023 + 7.999 + 8.132) / (7.727 + 7.686 + 7.732) Out[2]: 1.043594728883128 ~4.4% slower. ---------- Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file47406/pep492bench.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue30491> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
