Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Thus, as the _pid argument is None in the new process, it launches a new > tracker if it needs to create a new Semaphore
I see. Is it an optimization problem, or does it risk leaking semaphores? The problem is if a semaphore shared with the child isn't garbage collected correctly. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31310> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
