INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> added the comment: > Note this is really a worst-case benchmark: lots of classes, no methods, no > user data beside the classes.
Since benchgcclasses.py doesn't creates dunder methods, cache doesn't have GC-tracked tuples, and ref cycles. benchgcclasses2.py adds three dunder methods: $ ./python benchgcclasses.py GC time: 13.0 ms gc: collecting generation 2... gc: objects in each generation: 1 0 94942 gc: objects in permanent generation: 0 gc: done, 0.0131s elapsed RSS: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND inada-n 29604 0.0 0.1 47052 30692 pts/2 S+ 20:42 0:00 ./python benchgcclasses.py $ ./python-patched benchgcclasses.py GC time: 17.2 ms gc: collecting generation 2... gc: objects in each generation: 1 0 135220 gc: objects in permanent generation: 0 gc: done, 0.0173s elapsed RSS: USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND inada-n 29626 0.0 0.2 49880 33464 pts/2 S+ 20:43 0:00 ./python-patched benchgcclasses.py ---------- Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file47379/benchgcclasses2.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32346> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
