Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> added the comment: > This is a step to getting rid of the peepholer.
There is no goal to get rid of the peepholer optimizer. Please don't invent this as a requirement. If some optimization are more easily performed upstream, then go ahead and move them upstream. The goal is to have a net reduction in complexity, not just the elimination of peephole.c just because you decided it should disappear. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32477> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
