Xavier de Gaye <xdeg...@gmail.com> added the comment: On archlinux it is easy to know precisely what patches are applied to iproute2 and how it is built (see https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk?h=packages/iproute2).
The attached two files, archlinux-ip_link.strace and archlinux-ip_link_list.strace, contain the output of strace run on the commands 'ip link' and 'ip link list' on archlinux. * For 'ip link', the sendto() syscall uses RTM_GETLINK to get information about a specific network interface. * For 'ip link list', this sendto() syscall is preceded by another sendto() syscall using RTM_NEWLINK to *create* information about a specific network interface. Conclusions: 1) Both commands are not equivalent, this seems to be a bug in iproute2 or its documentation (I did not read the whole iproute2 documentation). 2) By using RTM_NEWLINK, 'ip link list' requests a write-like operation that may be denied by SELinux if there is no policy that allows netlink_route_socket (nlmsg_write). I may be wrong but on Android API 26 it seems that only few processes get that permission: dhcp, clatd, logd, netd, rild, ... 3) From Python perspective it is more robust to call 'ip link' to handle platforms where SELinux is run in enforcing mode. I will update the PR to do only that change: s/ip link list/ip link/ ---------- versions: +Python 3.6 Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file47327/archlinux-ip_link_list.strace _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32199> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
