Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> added the comment: > I agree that the PR I offers little (or no) improvement but I implore you to > explore performance bottlenecks in async/await.
And I'm saying that there are no "performance bottlenecks in async/await". async/await is *not* asyncio. async/await and yield are language constructs that use generator objects. Your benchmark *does not* test async/await vs yield. It compares asyncio.gather to batches in asynq. Now, maybe asyncio.gather can be optimized, but we should open a separate issue for that if we can have a better implementation of it. Your benchmark doesn't test the performance of IO -- that's the thing we actually optimize in asyncio and that we usually benchmark. asyncio.gather is a niche thing, and usually network applications don't have it as a bottleneck. Closing this issue. ---------- resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32204> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
