STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: > These results look strange to me. I expected the same difference but smaller > the base time.
Honestly, I was also surprised. I checked the whole benchmark twice. I also rebased the PR locally to make sure that it's not a side effect of a recent change in master. Results are reliable and reproductible. FYI I ran the C benchmark on my laptop "apu" using CPU isolation. -- I reproduced the benchmark on my other "selma" laptop, without CPU isolation (so less reliable). C benchmark: haypo@selma$ python3 -m perf compare_to master.json ignore.json Mean +- std dev: [master] 932 ns +- 66 ns -> [ignore] 1.01 us +- 0.05 us: 1.09x slower (+9%) ==> +78 ns ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue27535> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
