Stefan Krah <ste...@bytereef.org> added the comment: On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 06:17:44PM +0000, Mark Dickinson wrote: > I'm really reluctant to (even conditionally) skip the test, because it's > doing exactly what it's designed to do, namely detecting and reporting that > Python is giving poor results in this corner case on this platform. As > developers, we can blame the poor results on the platform's libm, but that > doesn't help the user.
I would want the tests to fail, especially if it can occur on Linux (though I still suspect an i686 router in the reported case). Perhaps hide them behind -uall, so that *we* see the result but just executing ./python -m test passes. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31630> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
