Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> added the comment: Well, I agree there's an unfortunate trade-off here: One can skip the test, allowing the test suite to work on slightly older versions of Cygwin, from before this issue was fixed. However, I then lose regression testing on newer versions. My personal feeling in this case is that it's not a very important test and can be skipped in the future (although the bug that this test caught was fairly serious and one would want regression testing for it...)
As an alternative I could be more fine-grained and only skip the test on older versions of Cygwin that are affected. I was hoping to avoid putting in too much Cygwin-specific test utilities, though adding a version check for Cygwin is not terribly hard (I do the same for my Cygwin port of psutil). For reference, the current version of Cygwin that comes installed on AppVeyor (for which I'm trying to get a Cygwin build set up) is 2.8.0, which *is* (just barely) affected by this bug. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31883> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
