Cédric Krier <cedric.kr...@b2ck.com> added the comment: I'm using sqlitebck which provides similar functionality but instead of using a file name to store the backup it uses connection instances. I find it very useful. Here is my use case: to run tests of an application that requires a database filled, I do a 'copy' of an existing sqlite backup in a ':memory:' database. But with the proposed API, it is not possible to use the resulted ':memory:' database because it will be delete when the connection is closed. So I propose to add the option to pass a connection instead of a filename.
---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue27645> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
