STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@gmail.com> added the comment: Marc Andre Lemburg: "time.cock() is used in a lot of code. Why can't we simply replace the functionality with one of the other functions ? The documentation certainly allows for such a change, since it pretty much just says that only the delta between two values has a meaning."
Currently time.clock() is the same clock than time.perf_counter() on Windows, but it's closer to CPU time as time.process_time() on Unix. time.perf_counter() and time.process_time() have a different name because the they are different clocks and don't measure the same thing. The main obvious difference is that time.process_time() doesn't include time elapsed during sleep. >>> import time >>> c1=time.perf_counter(); p1=time.process_time(); time.sleep(1); >>> c2=time.perf_counter(); p2=time.process_time() >>> c2-c1, p2-p1 (1.0010841980038094, 7.308599999999998e-05) I don't see how to modify clock() to make it behave the same on Windows and Unix without breaking any application which relies on the current clock() behaviour. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31803> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
