Aaron Hall <aaronch...@yahoo.com> added the comment: So... moving the closure (which may be called recursively) to the global scope actually does improve performance (for small cases, about 10% - larger cases amortize the cost of the closure being built, but in a 100 item dictionary, still about 4% faster to extricate the closure). So I'm reopening. Also suggesting we consider doing this with other functions if they are unnecessarily closures in the module.
`fix_missing_locations` appears to be another such function with an unnecessary closure. the closure in `dump` cannot be removed without some rewriting of the signature, as it uses variables it closes over. Not sure this would be worth it. ---------- resolution: rejected -> status: closed -> open _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31753> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
