Amber Brown <hawk...@atleastfornow.net> added the comment: Donald hits it on the head for me.
As long as the code is not covered by the same API deprecation contract that the rest of the standard library is, it should make it obvious when attempting to use it. I can be relatively certain that a lot of people were not aware that the potential scope of asyncio changes included what it potentially could have, and I personally wasn't aware that typing was a provisional module (and got burnt by incompatible changes in 3.6). There was a small note in the docs, but when I was learning from cattrs's docs and not CPython's, how was I supposed to know? A warning is low cost, there's a way to switch it off, and it potentially informs users that they need to be aware of its provisional status, especially if it's a dependency of a dependency. ---------- nosy: +hawkowl _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue31742> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
